viernes, 10 de febrero de 2017

Curcumin: an orally bioavailable blocker of TNF and other pro-inflammatory biomarkers

Resultado de imagen de curcumina


Extensive research during the past century has revealed that inflammation plays a major role in most chronic diseases. It was Cornelius Celsus, a physician in first century Rome, who first attempted to describe inflammation as heat (calor), pain (dolor), redness (rubor) and swelling (tumour). Rudolf Virchow, a German scientist from Wurzburg, in 1850, was the first to observe a link between inflammation and various chronic diseases, which include cancer, atherosclerosis, arthritis, diabetes, asthma, multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer's disease (Heidland et al., ). More than 200 different types of inflammatory disease have been described. When the name of a disease ends with ‘itis’, this means inflammation of the affected organ. Thus, arthritis is inflammation of the joints, whereas bronchitis, sinusitis, gastritis, oesophagitis, pancreatitis, meningitis, rhinitis and gingivitis are, respectively, inflammation of the bronchi, sinuses, stomach, oesophagus, pancreas, brain, nose and gums. Acute inflammation is thought to be therapeutic as it helps an organism to heal. Chronic inflammation, however, can lead to a disease; inflammation of the colon (colitis), for example, when persistant, for as long as 30 years, can finally lead to colon cancer.
During the past three decades, molecular mechanisms that lead to inflammation have been extensively examined. Various enzymes, cytokines, chemokines and polypeptide hormones have been identified, which can mediate inflammation. These include COX-2, 5-lipooxygenase (LOX), TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, Il-17, IL-21, IL-23 and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1). Among these, TNF-α is a major mediator of inflammation, which is the primary focus of this review.

Discovery of TNFs

TNF has at various times been called tumour necrosis serumcachectinlymphotoxin or monocyte cytotoxin based on work from our laboratory and others. It is now clear that TNF is a 25 kDa transmembrane protein (17 kDa when secreted) produced primarily by activated macrophages. The ability of tumours to undergo haemorrhagic necrosis after injection of endotoxin was first shown by Shear and Perrault (). O'Malley et al. () reported that endotoxin injection into normal mice resulted in the appearance of tumour necrotizing activity in the circulating blood. This activity was renamed tumour necrosis factor by Carswell et al. (). The true chemical identity of TNF, however, was unclear until our group isolated two different molecules: one from macrophages, which we named TNF-α (Aggarwal et al., ), and the other from lymphocytes, which we named TNF-β (Aggarwal et al., ). The current review primarily deals with TNF-α.
Because of the amino acid sequence homology between human TNF-α and endotoxin-induced murine cachectin, a protein linked to endotoxin-mediated cachexia and shock (Beutler et al., ), it became clear that TNF-α and cachectin were identical. Soon thereafter, numerous groups independently identified the same molecule by using a variety of approaches (Haranaka et al., ; Old, ; Wang et al., ; Fiers et al., ; Wallach, ). TNF-α is now known to bind to two different receptors, TNFRSF1A and TNFRSF1B, and to activate caspase-mediated apoptosis, NF-κB, activator protein-1 (AP-1), JNK, p38 MAPK and ERK signalling (Figure 1). Our group demonstrated that both TNF-α and TNF-β bind to identical receptors and with similar affinities (Aggarwal et al., ). Although much is known about TNF-α, very little is understood about TNF-β (Aggarwal, ; Aggarwal et al., ). Both overlapping and non-overlapping activities of the two molecules have been reviewed (Stone-Wolff et al., ; Kuprash et al., ; Liepinsh et al., ).
Figure 1
Regulation of the production and action of TNF by curcumin. TNFR1 and TNFR2 are TNF receptors TNFRSF1A and TNFRSF1B respectively. Targets highlighted as yellow are down modulated by curcumin.
Aside from originating in monocytes, it is now clear that TNF-α is also produced by a variety of other cell types including Kupffer cells in the liver, astrocytes in the brain, T-cells and beta cells in the immune system, and ovarian cells. In general, under appropriate conditions, most cell types have the potential to produce TNF-α.

TNF-α and inflammation

It is only within the past few decades that the mechanisms by which inflammation is mediated at the molecular level have become apparent. Although the role of macrophages in inflammation has been known for quite some time, the first indication of the pro-inflammatory activity of TNF emerged in 1985 when it was found to stimulate collagenase and PGE2 production by isolated human synovial cells and dermal fibroblasts (Dayer et al., ; Caput et al., ), thus suggesting that TNF may play a role in the tissue destruction and remodelling associated with inflammatory diseases.

TNF-associated diseases

TNF dysregulation has been linked to a wide variety of diseases including cancer, obesity, cardiovascular diseases, pulmonary diseases, metabolic diseases, neurological diseases, psychological diseases, skin diseases and autoimmune diseases (Aggarwal, ; Aggarwal et al., ). Thus, blockers of TNF have been approved for the treatment of various autoimmune disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn's disease (CD), psoriasis, hidradenitis suppurativa and refractory asthma. The inhibition of TNF can be achieved with monoclonal antibodies such as infliximab (Remicade; Janssen Biotech Inc., Horsham, PA, USA), adalimumab (Humira; Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL, USA), certolizumab pegol (Cimzia; UCB, Brussels, Belgium) and golimumab (Simponi; Janssen Biotech) or with a circulating receptor fusion protein such as etanercept (Enbrel; Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA). Their potential use in other pro-inflammatory diseases is currently being explored. Some of the important adverse effects most extensively associated with TNF blockers include lymphoma, infections, congestive heart failure, demyelinating disease, a lupus-like syndrome, induction of auto-antibodies, injection site reactions and systemic adverse effects (Scheinfeld, ).

Suppression of TNF-α production by curcumin in vitro

Numerous reports have suggested that the production of TNF from macrophages activated by various stimuli can be suppressed by curcumin (Table 1). Studies have supported findings that LPS is one of the major inducers of TNF-α in macrophages and monocytes and that curcumin can down-regulate the expression of TNF-α (Chan, ; Abe et al., ; Jang et al., ; Gao et al., ; Strasser et al., ; Woo et al., ; Liang et al., ; Cheung et al., ; Jain et al., ; Nishida et al., ; Zhao et al., ). Besides being expressed by myeloid cells, TNF is also expressed by microglial cells, adipocytes and other cell types. Curcumin, however, has been shown to down-regulate TNF expression (Jin et al., ; Lee et al., ; Zhang et al., ). In addition to being induced by LPS, TNF is also upregulated by a variety of other stimuli including phorbol ester, palmitate and other inflammatory cytokines, and curcumin has been shown to block the expression of TNF induced by all of these stimuli (Abe et al., ; Lee et al., ; Jain et al., ; Wang et al., ).
Table 1
Curcumin inhibits the production and action of TNF in vitro
How curcumin down-regulates TNF expression in different cell types and in response to a variety of stimuli has been examined extensively. TNF suppression primarily occurs at the transcriptional level. The factors known to be involved in TNF transcription include the transcription factor ETS (Kramer et al., ), activating transcription factor 2 (ATF2)/Jun (Leitman et al., ; Newell et al., ; Tsai et al., ,), Sp1 (Kramer et al., ), nuclear factor of activated T-cell transcription factor (NFAT) (McCaffrey et al., ; Tsai et al., ,), NF-κB (Udalova et al., ; Kuprash et al., ), early growth response protein-1 (Kramer et al., ), cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) (Geist et al., ), CCAAT/enhancer binding protein β (C/EBPβ) (Pope et al., ; Wedel et al., ; Zagariya et al., ), NF-E2-related factor 1 (Novotny et al., ; Prieschl et al., ) and LPS-induced TNF-α factor (LITAF) (Takashiba et al., ; Myokai et al., ) (Figure 1). Hence, different transcription factors appear to be involved in the stimulation of TNF expression by various stimuli and in different cell types. For instance, the transcription factor LITAF is involved in LPS-stimulated TNF expression. Whereas ATF2/Jun and NFATp are involved in TNF expression in activated beta and T-cells, C/EBPβ is involved in human monocytes. Several of these transcription factors have been shown to be modulated by curcumin.
Curcumin can mediate its effect on TNF expression by inhibiting p300/CREB-specific acetyl transferase, leading to repression of the acetylation of histone/non-histone proteins and histone acetyl transferase-dependent chromatin transcription (Balasubramanyam et al., ). It is also well known that curcumin can down-modulate the activation of NF-κB by a variety of agents (Singh and Aggarwal, ) and this down-regulation of NF-κB by curcumin plays a major role in suppressing the expression of TNF. In addition, in a number of studies it has been shown that methylation of a TNF promoter may affect the promoter's function (Kochanek et al., ; Muiznieks and Doerfler, ; Takei et al., ). Thus, curcumin could affect TNF expression by affecting the methylation of a TNF promoter (Reuter et al., ).
It is possible that the effects of curcumin on LPS-induced TNF production are mediated in part through its LPS signalling. Two of the toll-like receptors (TLRs), TLR2 and TLR4, mediate responsiveness to LPS. LPS-mediated TLR2 mRNA induction has been shown to be attenuated by pretreatment with curcumin (Matsuguchi et al., ). In addition, there is biochemical evidence indicating that curcumin can inhibit both ligand-induced and ligand-independent dimerization of TLR4 (Youn et al., ). The beneficial effect of curcumin is partly mediated by reducing the expression levels of TNF through inhibition of the expression of TLR2, TLR4 and TLR9 in mouse liver (Tu et al., ). Curcumin also binds with sub-micromolar affinity to the myeloid differentiation protein-2 (MD-2), which is the LPS-binding component of the endotoxin surface receptor complex MD-2/TLR4 (Gradisar et al., ). The binding site for curcumin overlaps with that of LPS; this results in the inhibition of MyD88-dependent and MyD88-independent signalling pathways of LPS signalling through TLR4, indicating that MD-2 is an important target of curcumin involved in its suppression of the innate immune response to bacterial infection.

Suppression of TNF-α-mediated signalling by curcumin in vitro

There are numerous reports suggesting that curcumin can not only block the production of TNF but also block the cell signalling mediated by TNF in a variety of cell types (Table 1). Our group was the first to show that curcumin can inhibit TNF-mediated NF-κB action in variety of cell types (Singh and Aggarwal, ). We also showed that TNF-mediated expression of various cell surface adhesion molecules in endothelial cells is down-regulated by curcumin (Kumar et al., ). Since then, a wide variety of cell signalling pathways activated by TNF have been shown to be down-regulated by curcumin; these include JNK, MAPK, PI3K/Akt.
In addition, curcumin has also been shown to modulate TNF-α function by directly binding to the ligand (Gupta et al., ). Wua et al. () performed molecular docking studies with TNF-α and curcumin to predict and analyse the ability of curcumin to inhibit TNF-α by binding to it. The protein–ligand interactions were analysed by simulating the docking of the curcumin using Autodock 4.0. They identified three main binding regions for curcumin and found that curcumin is a potent inhibitor of TNF-α. They also observed that curcumin docked at the receptor-binding sites of TNF-α. Covalent π-π aromatic interactions or π–cation interactions were found between curcumin and TNF-α. The authors predicted that curcumin is a strong inhibitor of TNF-α because of the covalent bonds it forms with Cys129 in TNF-α. In contrast to its interaction with TNF-α, it is unclear whether curcumin can interact or affect the expression of TNF-β or lymphotoxin.

Suppression of TNF by curcumin in vivo

The anti-inflammatory effect of curcumin was first demonstrated in acute and chronic models of inflammation in rats and mice (Srimal and Dhawan, ). The authors showed that curcumin (50–200 mg·kg−1) suppressed carrageenan-induced oedema in mice. Furthermore, curcumin was found to be as potent as phenylbutazone and exhibited minimal ulcerogenic activity. No mortality in mice was noted at doses as high as 2 g·kg−1 bodyweight (Srimal and Dhawan, ). In the same study, the authors showed that curcumin suppresses formaldehyde-induced arthritis in rats at a dose of 40 mg·kg−1 and inhibited granuloma formation at 80–160 mg·kg−1. However, the mechanism by which curcumin mediates these anti-inflammatory effects in animals was not revealed until several years later, when our group showed that curcumin can suppress TNF-induced NF-κB activation (Singh and Aggarwal, ) and other groups showed that curcumin blocked TNF production in cell culture (Chan, ) and the expression of pro-inflammatory genes (Jobin et al., ). Since then, numerous mechanisms by which curcumin can exhibit anti-inflammatory activity have been proposed (Figures 1 and and22).
Figure 2
Inflammatory targets modulated by curcumin.
Numerous reports have been published suggesting that oral administration of curcumin down-regulates TNF-α expression both in the serum and in the tissue of animals (Nanji et al., ; Yao et al., ; Sharma et al., ; Billerey-Larmonier et al., ; Larmonier et al., ; Ung et al., ; El-Moselhy et al., ; Gutierres et al., ) (Table 2). Attenuation of TNF-α levels by curcumin has been noted in mice (Leyon and Kuttan, ), rats (Siddiqui et al., ) and rabbits (Yao et al., ; Huang et al., ). A dose of curcumin of 50–500 mg·kg−1·day−1 was used for most of these studies. Endotoxin has been shown to induce septic shock in animals, in part, through the production of TNF, and this condition has been shown to be reversed by curcumin (Siddiqui et al., ; Chen et al., ; Huang et al., ; Nishida et al., ). Decreased TNF-α levels have also been noted in tumour-bearing animals treated with this polyphenol (Leyon and Kuttan, ). In addition to cancer, down-regulation of TNF-α by curcumin has been associated with protection from various pro-inflammatory diseases, including sub-chronic inflammation (Nandal et al., ; Nishida et al., ), cardiovascular diseases (Yao et al., ; Mito et al., ; Avci et al., ), diabetes (Jain et al., ; El-Azab et al., ; El-Moselhy et al., ), acute pancreatitis (Gulcubuk et al., ), enterocolitis (Jia et al., ), enteritis (Song et al., ), prostatitis (Zhang et al., ), diabetic neuropathy (Sharma et al., ), hepatic injury (Yun et al., ), Th1-type ileitis (Bereswill et al., ), hepatic fibrosis (Shu et al., ; Zeng et al., ), radiation-induced lung fibrosis (Lee et al., ), asthma (Ammar el et al., ), alcohol-induced liver disease (Nanji et al., ), non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (Ramirez-Tortosa et al., ), concanavalin A-induced liver injury (Tu et al., ), renal injury (Hashem et al., ; Pan et al., ), infection (Allam, ), fatigue (Gupta et al., ), bone turnover (Yang et al., ) and high-fat diet-induced hyperglycaemia (El-Moselhy et al., ). Curcumin has also been found to down-regulate NF-κB-regulated gene products such as inducible NOS (iNOS), IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, MMP-2 and MMP-9 in animals (Yao et al., ; Yeh et al., ; Jain et al., ). Curcumin also protects against the toxic effects of copper overload (Wan et al., ), dextran sulfate sodium (Arafa et al., ), p-dioxin (Ciftci et al., ) and aluminum (Sood et al., ) through down-modulation of TNF-α.
Table 2
Curcumin inhibits TNF production in animals
A reduction in the production of iNOS mRNA was observed when BALB/c mouse peritoneal macrophages cultured ex vivo were treated with 1–20 μM curcumin (Chan et al., ); in vivo, two oral treatments of 0.5 mL of a 10 μM solution of curcumin (92 ng·g−1 bodyweight) reduced iNOS mRNA expression in the livers of LPS-injected mice by 50–70% (Chan et al., ). This suggests that curcumin is potent at nmol g−1bodyweight. This efficacy was associated with two modifications of the schedule of dosing: firstly, an aqueous solution of curcumin was prepared by initially dissolving the compound in 0.5 N NaOH and then diluting it immediately with PBS; secondly, mice were fed curcumin at dusk after fasting. Inhibition of iNOS mRNA expression was not observed in the mice that were fed ad libitum, suggesting that food intake may interfere with the absorption of curcumin.

Oral bioavailability and safety of curcumin

Curcumin usually manifests its biological response when given orally to mice at about 50–500 mg·kg−1bodyweight (Farombi and Ekor, ). These doses, however, are too low to detect significant levels of curcumin in the serum. The reason for this discrepancy is not clear; however, there are several possible explanations. Firstly, curcumin is known to bind to numerous proteins present in the serum including albumin (Gupta et al., ; Kim et al., ). Secondly, curcumin is rapidly transported across the cells and tissues (Anand et al., ). Thirdly, tetrahydrocurcumin, a metabolite of curcumin, was found to be more active than curcumin for treating chloroquine-induced hepatotoxicity in rats (Pari and Amali, ). Fourthly, in another study it was shown that when curcumin was dissolved in 0.1 N NaOH it manifested its effects in animals in the μg·kg−1 range (Chan et al., ).
In one recent study the potential of a novel solid lipid curcumin particle (SLCP) preparation to produce adverse effects in rats after acute and sub-chronic administration was investigated (Dadhaniya et al., ). The oral LD50 of the preparation in rats as well as in mice was found to be greater than 2000 mg·kg−1bodyweight. In the sub-chronic toxicity study, 180, 360 and 720 mg·kg−1 bodyweight day−1 of SLCP preparation was administered via oral gavage to Wistar rats (10 per sex per group) for 90 days. Administration of the curcumin preparation did not result in any toxicologically significant treatment-related changes in clinical (including behavioural) observations, ophthalmic examinations, bodyweights, bodyweight gains, food consumption and organ weights. No adverse effects of the curcumin preparation were noted on the haematology, serum chemistry parameters and urinalysis. Terminal necropsy did not reveal any treatment-related gross or histopathology findings. On the basis of these study results, the no observed-adverse-effect level for this standardized novel curcumin preparation was determined as 720 mg·kg−1 bodyweight day−1.
In humans, as little as 150 mg of curcumin has been shown to be effective in reducing serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (Usharani et al., ) (Table 3). The effect of curcumin administration, 500 mg of curcumin day−1 for 7 days, on serum levels of cholesterol and lipid peroxides was studied in 10 healthy human volunteers (Soni and Kuttan, ). A significant decrease in the level of serum lipid peroxides was noted, along with an increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and a decrease in total serum cholesterol. In another study, curcumin was given orally at up to 8000 mg·day−1 to 25 patients (Cheng et al., ). The serum concentration of curcumin usually peaked at 1–2 h after oral intake of curcumin and gradually declined within 12 h. The average peak serum concentrations after oral intake of 4000, 6000 and 8000 mg of curcumin were 0.51 ± 0.11, 0.63 ± 0.06 and 1.77 ± 1.87 μM respectively. , However, urinary excretion of curcumin was undetectable.
Table 3
Curcumin inhibits TNF production in humans
Vareed et al. () examined the pharmacokinetics of a curcumin preparation in healthy human volunteers at 0.25–72 h after a single oral dose. Curcumin was administered at doses of 10 g (n = 6 subjects) and 12 g (n = 6 subjects). Using HPLC with a limit of detection of 50 ng·mL−1, only one subject had detectable free curcumin at any of the 14 time points assayed, but curcumin glucuronides and sulfates were detected in all subjects. Based on the pharmacokinetic model, the area under the curve for the 10 and 12 g doses was 35.33 ± 3.78 and 26.57 ± 2.97 μg·mL−1 × h, respectively, whereas Cmax was 2.30 ± 0.26 and 1.73 ± 0.19 μg·mL−1. The Tmax and t1/2 were estimated to be 3.29 ± 0.43 and 6.77 ± 0.83 h. The ratio of glucuronide to sulfate was 1.92:1. The curcumin conjugates were present as either glucuronide or sulfate, not as mixed conjugates. The group concluded that curcumin is absorbed after oral dosing in humans and can be detected as glucuronide and sulfate conjugates in plasma. Another study evaluated the efficacy of oral curcumin (4 g·day−1) in 26 patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undefined significance (Golombick et al., ). They found that oral curcumin was bioavailable as it decreased paraprotein load. Thus, all of these studies clearly demonstrate that although serum levels of curcumin administered orally are very low, it can still manifest its effect in vivo.

Suppression of TNF-α by curcumin in patients

At least two studies have suggested that orally administered curcumin can down-modulate the expression of TNF-α in patients (Usharani et al., ; He et al., ) (Table 3). In addition, several other pro-inflammatory biomarkers are decreased by curcumin in human subjects (Hanai and Sugimoto, ; Khajehdehi et al., ; Koosirirat et al., ). In most of these studies, 150–500 mg of curcumin was sufficient to manifest a response.
The interest in curcumin research in human participants has increased markedly over the years (Table 4). To date, over 60 clinical trials have evaluated the safety and efficacy of this polyphenol in humans, whereas another 35 clinical trials are further evaluating its efficacy. Curcumin was found to be effective in TNF-associated human diseases such as cancer, cardiovascular diseases, metabolic diseases, neurological diseases, skin diseases, RA, CD and psoriasis. However, whether curcumin exerts its effects through modulation of TNF in these patients is, at present, unclear. Given the fact that most of the currently available TNF blockers produce adverse effects in patients and are very expensive, this orally bioavailable polyphenol represents an important therapeutic for TNF-associated diseases.
Table 4
Chronological listing of curcumin studies in human participants
In addition to its efficacy in TNF-associated human diseases, curcumin has been found to be effective in a number of other human diseases. Readers interested in such studies should refer to one of the recent reviews published from this laboratory (Gupta et al., ).

Role of curcumin in TNF-related diseases

Rheumatoid arthritis

Numerous reports have suggested that TNF plays a major role in RA. Thus, TNF blockers have been found to be beneficial for patients with RA. Therefore, curcumin has been tested as a treatment for RA. One of the earliest indications of its potential efficacy was obtained in 1973, when curcumin was found to suppress formaldehyde-induced arthritis in rats at a dose of 40 mg·kg−1 and inhibit granuloma formation at 80–160 mg·kg−1 (Srimal and Dhawan, ). Later, Joe et al. () showed that curcumin can lower the elevated serum acidic glycoprotein levels present in adjuvant-induced arthritis. Also, oral administration of curcumin has been shown to prevent streptococcal cell wall–induced arthritis in mice (Funk et al., ) and to suppress MMP-1 and MMP-3 production and attenuate the inflammatory response in a collagen-induced arthritis model in mice (Moon et al., ). In addition, curcumin has been found to down-regulate the expression of TNF-α and IL-1β in ankle joints and decrease NF-κB activity, PGE2 production, COX-2 expression and MMP secretion in synoviocytes. Furthermore, curcumin has been shown to have a synergistic effect with methotrexate in decreasing adjuvant-induced arthritis in mice and in minimizing liver damage (Banji et al., ).
Other in vitro findings indicate that the protective effects of curcumin against RA are mediated through inhibition of neutrophil activation, suppression of synoviocyte proliferation and inhibition of angiogenesis as suggested by curcumin's ability to inhibit collagenase and stromelysin in chondrocytes (Jackson et al., ). Further, the suppression of NF-κB by curcumin has been found to be associated with its inhibition of the expression of COX-2, NO, PGE2, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, MMP-3 and MMP-9 in human chondrocytes (Shakibaei et al., ; Mathy-Hartert et al., ). Curcumin has also been found to suppress IL-8 expression in human synovial fibroblasts (Tong et al., ).
One of the earliest studies demonstrating that curcumin has anti-rheumatic activity in humans appeared almost three decades ago (Deodhar et al., ). In a more recent, the efficacy of a proprietary complex of curcumin with soy phosphatidylcholine (Meriva®; Throne Research Inc., Dover, ID, USA) was investigated in 50 patients with osteoarthritis (OA) at a dosage of 200 mg of curcumin day−1 (Belcaro et al., ). OA symptoms were evaluated by the use of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores. After 3 months of treatment with this complex, the global WOMAC score was found to be decreased by 58% (P < 0.05), walking distance in the treadmill test was prolonged from 76 to 332 m (P < 0.05) and C-reactive protein levels decreased from 168 ± 18 to 11.3 ± 4.1 mg·L−1 in the subpopulation with high C-reactive protein levels. In comparison, the control group experienced only a modest improvement in these parameters. These results show that curcumin is clinically effective in the management and treatment of OA. In another study, the same investigator examined the efficacy and safety of Meriva in 100 patients with OA after long-term administration (8 months) (Belcaro et al., ). The clinical end points were WOMAC score, Karnofsky performance scale index score and treadmill walking performance, and were complemented by the evaluation of a series of inflammatory markers including IL-1β, IL-6, sCD40L, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Significant improvements in both the clinical and the biochemical end points were observed for the Meriva group compared with the control group.
In another randomized pilot study, the efficacy of curcumin alone and in combination with diclofenac sodium was assessed in patients with active RA (Chandran and Goel, ). Forty-five patients diagnosed as having RA were randomized into three groups: patients receiving curcumin alone (500 mg), those receiving diclofenac sodium alone (50 mg) and those receiving combinations of curcumin and diclofenac sodium. The primary end points were reduction in Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28. The secondary end points included American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for reduction in tenderness and swelling of joint scores. Patients in the curcumin group showed the highest percentage of improvement in overall DAS and ACR scores, which were significantly better than those of patients in the diclofenac sodium group. To our knowledge, this is the first evidence showing the potential of curcumin as a therapeutic for patients with active RA.

Inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) consists of two separate diseases, CD and ulcerative colitis (UC); both characterized by chronic recurrent ulceration of the bowel (Kozuch and Hanauer, ). It is likely that the pathogenesis of these diseases involves genetic, environmental and immunological factors (Hanauer, ). The expression of several cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and chemokines, all regulated by NF-κB, is increased in IBD (Ferretti et al., ; Jijon et al., ; Yamamoto et al., ; Jobin, ). All of these critical proteins are up-regulated by NF-κB and suppression of NF-κB by anti-sense can attenuate experimental colitis in mice (Neurath et al., ). Among the various gut immune factors, TNF-α is a major pro-inflammatory cytokine in IBD (Brown and Mayer, ; Louis, ). Mucosal levels of TNF-α are elevated in patients with IBD (Murch et al., ; Braegger et al., ), and its inhibition (Papadakis and Targan, ) or neutralization can improve both UC (Jarnerot, ) and CD (Ardizzone and Bianchi Porro, ). Conventional therapies for UC include sulfasalazine, 5-aminosalicylic acid, salazosulfapyridine, azathioprine, mercaptopurines, cyclosporine, corticosteroids and TNF blockers (Kozuch and Hanauer, ; Ng and Kamm, ). All of these treatments have significant toxic side effects and are partly or completely ineffective in a significant number of patients.
Now there are numerous lines of evidence to suggest that curcumin has enormous potential against both CD and UC (Table 5). Firstly, epidemiological studies indicate that turmeric (which contains 2–8% curcuminoids) may contribute to the lower incidence of cancer, especially large-bowel cancers in Indians (Mohandas and Desai, ; Sinha et al., ). Secondly, curcumin, when administered orally in the diet, prevented trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS)- or dinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (DNBS)-induced colitis in mice (Sugimoto et al., ; Salh et al., ; Venkataranganna et al., ; Ung et al., ). Thirdly, curcumin improves both the wasting and histopathological signs of colonic inflammation. Fourthly, curcumin inhibits CD4+ T-cell infiltration and NF-κB activation in colonic mucosa. Fifthly, curcumin manifests its effects against colitis by suppressing the expression of inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α (Camacho-Barquero et al., ; Mouzaoui et al., ), IFN-γ (Ung et al., ), IL-17 (Ung et al., ) and enzymes, such as p38 MAPK, iNOS, COX-2, myeloperoxidase and MMP-9, in the colonic mucosa (Camacho-Barquero et al., ). Sixthly, curcumin has a therapeutic effect on DNBS-induced colitis in mice induced by its agonistic action on the vanilloid receptor TRPV1 (Martelli et al., ). Seventhly, curcumin suppresses colonic inflammation induced by deletion of the mdr1 gene in mice (Nones et al., ). The effects of curcumin in TNBS-induced colitis in mice were found to be strain-dependent: BALB/c mice were protected, whereas SJL/J mice were not protected (Billerey-Larmonier et al., ). The effect of curcumin against colitis was also limited in Th1-driven colitis in IL-10-deficient mice (Larmonier et al., ; Ung et al., ). Curcumin failed to inhibit NF-κB in these mice, but when combined with IL-10, curcumin inhibited NF-κB quite effectively. Eighthly, curcumin decreases TNF-α-induced oxidative stress and colitis in mice (Mouzaoui et al., ). Ninthly, curcumin combined with resveratrol and simvastatin decreases acute small intestinal inflammation in mice by down-regulating the Th1-type immune response (Bereswill et al., ). Tenthly, curcumin suppresses TNBS-induced colonic inflammation in mice by down-regulation of NF-κB, TLR4 and MyD88 (Lubbad et al., ). Eleventhly, curcumin has been shown to inhibit colitis by inducing the production of tolerogenic dendritic cells that promote differentiation of T-cells into Treg, which include CD4+CD25+Foxp3+Treg and IL-10-producing Tr1 cells, and by producing TGF-β (Cong et al., ). Twelfthly, curcumin can reverse TNF-α-mediated reduction in Phex protein in mice, which is responsible for the inhibition of osteoblast mineralization linked to the abnormal bone metabolism associated with IBD (Uno et al., ). For this, the authors examined calvaria of 6- to 7-week-old mice given TNBS with or without neutralizing TNF-α antibody, dietary curcumin or systemically with recombinant TNF-α. They found that compared to control animals, Phex mRNA expression decreased by 40–50% in both TNBS colitis and TNF-α-injected mice. Dietary curcumin and TNF-α antibody counteracted these detrimental effects of TNBS on Phex gene expression.
Table 5
Effect of curcumin on models of inflammatory bowel disease
Thus, the above findings in animals clearly indicate that orally administered curcumin has the potential to protect from the development of IBD. Additional evidence suggests its potential in humans. Firstly, as little as 150 mg of curcumin twice daily can suppress the levels of expression of inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-6 in serum (Usharani et al., ; He et al., ). Secondly, a dose of 2 g·day−1 of curcumin can suppress NF-κB activation in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (Vadhan-Raj et al., ). Thirdly, curcumin was found to suppress p38 MAPK, reduce IL-1β and MMP-3, and enhance IL-10 in mucosa of children and adults with IBD (Epstein et al., ). Fourthly, more than 65 different trials have been conducted with orally administered curcumin in humans. Fifthly, promising results were obtained from a small open-label study examining the use of curcumin to treat IBD (Holt et al., ). A pure curcumin preparation was administered to five patients with ulcerative proctitis and to five patients with CD. All patients with proctitis improved, and four had their concomitant medications reduced; four of the five CD patients had lowered CDAI scores and sedimentation rates. Sixthly, in a randomized multicentre double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, curcumin was examined as a maintenance therapy for UC and found to produce favourable effects (Hanai et al., ). Of 89 patients with UC, 45 received 1 g of curcumin after breakfast and 1 g after their evening meal, plus sulfasalazine and mesalamine for 6 months. Of the 43 patients who received curcumin, 2 (4.65%) experienced relapse during the 6 months of therapy, whereas 8 (20.51%) of the 39 patients in the placebo group experienced relapse. Recurrence rates in the curcumin-treated and placebo groups were significantly different. Furthermore, curcumin use resulted in an improvement in both the clinical activity index and the endoscopic index and suppressed UC-associated morbidity. Thus, curcumin appears to be a promising and safe medication for maintaining remission in patients with quiescent UC. These two small studies have shown promising results for IBD. Seventhly, orally administered curcumin was found to have a therapeutic effect against colorectal cancer (He et al., ). In an open-label study in which 126 patients were treated with 360 mg, p.o., curcumin three times a day, curcumin's effects were noted within 10–30 days.


Like IBD and RA, psoriasis is a common chronic inflammatory disease of the skin and joints that affects about 2% of the general population is another indication for which TNF blockers have been approved. Depending on the stage of disease, current treatment options include UVB, UVA plus psoralen, methotrexate, acitretin, cyclosporine, infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, efalizumab and alefacept. Whereas infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab are specific TNF blockers, all of the others are immunosuppressive agents that could increase the risk of infections and malignancies, especially with long-term use (Greaves and Weinstein, ; Kurd et al., ). Psoriasis is a chronic disease, which requires long-term treatment and 51% of patients with psoriasis use complementary and alternative therapies (Fleischer et al., ). Thus, safe, affordable and effective agents are needed to treat this condition.
There are several reasons to believe that curcumin may have potential for treating psoriasis. Firstly, on irradiation with visible light, curcumin has been proven to be phototoxic for Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli, even at very low concentrations (Tonnesen et al., ). This observed phototoxicity makes curcumin a potential photosensitizing drug, which could be used in phototherapy of psoriasis. Secondly, when curcumin was tested as an anti-psoriatic drug in the modified mouse tail test, an animal model of psoriasis, it exhibited some activity (Bosman, ). Thirdly, curcumin has been shown to inhibit the proliferation of human keratinocytes through suppression of pro-inflammatory pathways (Pol et al., ; Cho et al., ). Curcumin inhibited the expression of TNF-α-induced IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, cyclin E, MAPKs (JNK, p38 MAPK and ERK) and NF-κB in HaCaT cells. Because curcumin can reverse the anti-apoptotic function of TNF-α in skin cells, it may have potential for the treatment of psoriasis (Sun et al., ). Fourthly, as TNF blockers have been successfully used to treat psoriasis and since curcumin can block both the production and the action of TNF, curcumin may have potential as a treatment of psoriasis. Fifthly, our laboratory has shown that curcumin is a potent inhibitor of phosphorylase kinase (PhK) activity (Reddy and Lokesh, ), the elevation in which has been correlated with psoriatic activity (Heng et al., ).
Heng et al. () investigated whether the anti-psoriatic activity of curcumin in patients is due to suppression of PhK activity. In this study, PhK activity was assayed in four groups of 10 subjects each: (i) active untreated psoriasis; (ii) resolving psoriasis treated by calcipotriol, a vitamin D3 analogue and indirect inhibitor of PhK; (iii) curcumin treatment (1% in gel); and (iv) 10 normal non-psoriatic subjects. PhK activity, from highest to lowest, was as follows: the active untreated psoriasis group, the calcipotriol-treated group, the curcumin-treated group and the non-psoriatic subjects. The decrease in PhK activity in the curcumin-treated and calcipotriol-treated psoriasis groups was associated with a decrease in the expression of the keratinocyte transferrin receptor, a reduced severity of parakeratosis and a reduction in the density of epidermal CD8+ T-cells. The authors of this study concluded that drug-induced suppression of PhK activity is associated with resolution of psoriatic activity and that the anti-psoriatic activity of curcumin may be achieved through its modulation of PhK.
The safety and efficacy of oral curcumin in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis has been investigated in a prospective phase II, open-label, Simon's two-stage clinical trial (Kurd et al., ). Twelve patients with chronic plaque psoriasis were enrolled in this study and were given a 4.5 g curcumin capsule per day for 12 weeks; this was followed by a 4 week observation period. Curcumin was well tolerated and all participants completed the study. However, the response rate was low and possibly caused by a placebo effect or the natural history of psoriasis. Nevertheless, two patients who responded to the treatment showed 83–88% improvement at 12 weeks of treatment. There were no study-related adverse events that necessitated participant withdrawal. Small sample size and the lack of a control (placebo) group were the limitations of the study.

Refractory asthma

Patients' asthma is considered refractory when they experience persistent symptoms, frequent asthma attacks and/or low lung function despite taking asthma medications. Some patients with refractory asthma have to take oral steroids such as prednisone to manage their symptoms. TNF-α has been shown to have a pathobiological role in asthma, mainly in severe refractory asthma and in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (Matera et al., ). Thus, TNF-α inhibitors (infliximab, golimumab and etanercept) are now regarded as potential new medications in asthma and COPD management.
Numerous rodent studies suggest that curcumin may also have potential for treatment of asthma. Firstly, curcumin (at 20 mg·kg−1 bodyweight) was reported to attenuate allergen-induced airway hyper-responsiveness in sensitized guinea pigs (Ram et al., ). When administered to mice, it was found to prevent ovalbumin-induced airway inflammation by regulating NO (Moon et al., ) and, in a more recent study, to diminish the development of allergic airway inflammation and hyper-responsiveness, possibly through inhibition of NF-κB activation in asthmatic lung tissue (Oh et al., ). For these studies, BALB/c mice were sensitized to ovalbumin, allowing analysis of the effects of curcumin administration (200 mg·kg−1bodyweight per day, i.p.) on airway hyper-responsiveness, inflammatory cell number and IgE levels in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Ammar el et al. () also examined the anti-inflammatory activity of curcumin in a murine model of asthma and showed it down-modulated the serum levels of IgE, iNOS, transforming growth factor β1 and mRNA expression of TNF-α. Secondly, curcumin has been shown to have therapeutic potential for controlling allergic responses. Animals exposed to latex showed enhanced serum IgE; latex-specific IgG1, IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13; eosinophils; and inflammation in the lungs (Kurup et al., ). Intragastric treatment of latex-sensitized mice with curcumin demonstrated a diminished Th2 response with a concurrent reduction in lung inflammation. Eosinophilia in the curcumin-treated mice was markedly reduced, as was the expression of the co-stimulatory molecules (CD80, CD86 and OX40L) on antigen-presenting cells, and expression of MMP-9, ornithine amino transferase and thymic stromal lymphopoietin genes was also attenuated. Thirdly, curcumin was found to reverse corticosteroid resistance in monocytes exposed to oxidants by maintaining histone deacetylase-2 activity (Meja et al., ). Although no clinical data are available yet, all of these pre-clinical studies suggest that curcumin has potential as a therapeutic for asthma.


Overall, all these studies suggest that curcumin can suppress pro-inflammatory pathways linked with most chronic diseases. It can block both the production and the action of TNF. Curcumin also binds to TNF directly. Evidence for curcumin as a TNF blocker has been obtained in both in vitro and in vivo studies. However, only a few studies have demonstrated that curcumin is effective at inhibiting TNF production in humans. Unlike most other TNF blockers, curcumin can be given orally. In addition, it is quite safe and affordable. However, more studies are needed in humans to prove that curcumin has the ability to be an effective treatment of various pro-inflammatory conditions.

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario